EGI has launched a new effort to improve governance of the electricity sector in Brazil. The initiative is being led by Brazil’s leading consumer advocacy group, the Institute for Consumer Defense (IDEC). Greater understanding of, and responsiveness to, the concerns and motivations of consumers with respect to environmental sustainability will be integral to EGI/Brazil’s efforts.
Brazil is at a critical juncture with respect to its energy mix. The government projects surging demand for electricity in Brazil, while at the same time climate and hydrological changes are threatening the security of supply in a sector that is heavily dependent on large hydroelectric dams. The cost of electricity is poised to rise: from 2010 tariffs are likely to increase faster than the rate of inflation. Although natural gas and diesel fired generators are being brought on line to address the shortfall, there are substantial untapped opportunities for energy efficiency and alternative energy in Brazil which could significantly reduce the need for expensive new sources of electricity.
IDEC will lead a coalition including Centro Clima at the Institute for Post Graduate Studies and Research in Engineering of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (COPPE), the International Energy Initiative Latin America, the World Wildlife Fund Brazil, and the Brazilian Network of Civil Society Organizations for Renewable Energy (RENOVE).
The coalition will examine the following issues.
Planning processes and alternative energy: PROINFA and other incentives
PROINFA is one of the most progressive incentive programs to promote renewable energy in the world, setting a target to add 3,300 MW of wind, small hydro and biomass energy within 3 years – but there have been many problems with implementation since it was passed into law in 2002. This stalled progress is linked to weaknesses in governance that have precluded the necessary documentation, contract oversight, and stakeholder buy-in. A closer analysis of the development and implementation of PROINFA in the context of Brazil’s legislative and planning processes can yield vital insights into how to enhance the effectiveness and impact of such programs in the future.
Consumer representation in policy and regulatory processes
Electricity pricing is one of the most complex and contentious issues in the sector, and in Brazil there are many issues to address including: the hidden costs of subsidizing traditional sources of energy including large dams; the relative cost of alternative forms of energy in this context; and the need for social tariffs to meet the needs of the poor. Power sector companies in Brazil must pay a “wire charge” that streams a small portion of their revenues into a public fund to support energy conservation, and research and development of new technologies; but there is little accountability for how these funds are spent. Transparency, accountability and public participation around these issues will be increasingly important as imminent price hikes attract consumer concern, as they present important mechanisms to mitigate the impact on consumer welfare. In this context, it is important to assess the extent to which civil society and consumer protection organizations have the capacity to engage in and contribute to these discussions.
Luz Para Todos
While Luz Para Todos has achieved some impressive results, the program has faced serious obstacles in achieving its goal of universal access by 2015. The program has thus far been unable to reach people in remote and isolated communities, many of them in Amazonia. Here again, it has been difficult to overcome local political forces in the absence of wide spread stakeholder support for the program. Issues relating to incumbent suppliers, potential new agents, and community involvement remain unresolved. Legal barriers to off-grid renewable energy point to the need to develop new policy and regulatory processes that are more responsive to the needs of this population.
The keys to improving governance of the power sector in Brazil lie at the intersection of politics and administration. Through this initiative we seek to engage with legislators, government officials, planners and regulators as part of the assessment process, as well as with industry associations, small providers of alternative energy, and private sector leaders on social and environmental issues.
Marcos Pó IDEC email@example.com
Smita Nakhooda WRI firstname.lastname@example.org
Davida Wood WRI email@example.com